Researched — not tested
We have never had an MT5+ in our hands. Everything below is specification, mechanism, and the documented locksport record — tagged so you can see which is which.
The pin tumbler pushed about as far as the concept goes. Three separate mechanisms, a double-sided key doing two different jobs, UL 437 listing, ANSI Grade 1, and a key-control ecosystem built on a magnetic card and a proprietary cutting machine rather than on patent alone.
Two things a buyer should know that the marketing doesn't cover. It has been picked publicly since 2016, including blind, and there is a published methodology for learning to defeat it. And on thumbturn configurations there is a documented bypass that ignores all three mechanisms entirely — which is a door problem, not a cylinder problem, and the more likely one you'll actually face.
Cylinder engineering9
Manipulation resistance7
Key control8
Build & hardware10
Value for money8
How to read this review
Nothing here is hands-on. The value is in the mechanism explained properly and the defeat record read honestly.
TestedPhysically in hand. Nothing on this page carries this tag.
DocumentedPublished specification, standard, or a recorded opening.
ManufacturerMul-T-Lock's own claim. A claim, not a fact.
CommunityLocksmith and locksport consensus. Informed opinion.
Mul-T-Lock's signature technology, and the oldest of the three. Each pin stack is a pin within a pin — an outer sleeve and an inner pin that move independently, each of which must reach its own shear line. Documented
Compare that with an ordinary five-pin cylinder, where five chambers means five things to set. Here five chambers means ten independent elements, each needing to land correctly and stay there while you work the next.
The key does two jobs at once: dimple-style cuts on the flat of the blade address the telescopic pins, at depths that drive the inner and outer components differently. Manufacturer Mul-T-Lock describe the MT5 platform as using five telescopic pins, with some cylinder variants running ten telescopic elements.
This alone puts it far beyond anything on the budget end of the market. But telescopic pins are decades old, well understood, and dimple-lock pickers have been working on them for a long time — which matters in Chapter 4.
The locking bar is what the plus sign refers to, and it's a sidebar by another name. Documented
- A set of finger pins sits at ninety degrees to the key pins, with tiny fingers protruding into the edge of the keyway.
- A milled pattern along the side of the key — entirely separate from the dimple cuts — pushes those fingers to their correct positions.
- Only when every finger pin is right can the locking bar retract, regardless of what the telescopic pins are doing.
The detail that matters to anyone trying to open one: the finger pins are full of false gates. Community That's the same idea as a spool driver in an ordinary lock — deliberately feeding the attacker feedback that feels like progress and isn't — applied to a sidebar.
The milled pattern also does commercial work. Because it can be varied independently of the bitting, Mul-T-Lock use it to create exclusive keyways for individual dealers — a geographic monopoly on blanks enforced by the shape of the key.
The cleverest of the three, and the one with a date attached.
At the very tip of the MT5+ key is the Alpha Spring — a mobile, sprung element built into the key itself rather than the lock. When the key is fully inserted it engages a dedicated pin at the rear of the cylinder, creating an additional shear line that doesn't otherwise exist. Documented
Think about what that does to an attacker. The final security element isn't a component you can study by looking into the keyway — it is only created when a genuine key is present. A picker working from the front of the cylinder is trying to satisfy a shear line that a correct key brings into being.
The date nobody has updated
Mul-T-Lock's own product literature describes the Alpha Spring as protected by "a patent that expires only in 2025." Documented That phrasing appears across their catalogue and dealer material and was written as a selling point.
It is now 2026. On their own published timeline, that patent has expired.
This matters because patent protection is the legal foundation of restricted key control. While a patent runs, third parties making compatible blanks are infringing. Once it lapses, that particular barrier is gone — which is the story of every restricted keyway eventually, Medeco and Assa included.
The dates line up. The MT5+ platform and the KC5 cutting machine were introduced around 2006. Community A patent filed then, running a standard twenty-year term, expires in 2025 or 2026 — which is exactly what Mul-T-Lock's own copy says. It reads as a real date rather than a marketing flourish.
And Mul-T-Lock have already moved. Their current platform, MTL™800, leads on a double alpha spring — described as a patented moving element on the key blade's tip engaging a pin at the rear of the cylinder — and is "fully backward compatible with the previous MT5+: the same key cutting machines, the same tooling, and the same pinning kit." Documented
That is the standard industry response to a patent running out: introduce a new patented variant, restart the protection clock, and make it drop-in compatible so the installed base and the dealer tooling carry over. It is strong circumstantial confirmation that the MT5+'s original protection has lapsed.
The practical consequence: if you are buying today primarily for patent-backed key control, ask your dealer about MTL800 rather than MT5+. Same ecosystem, same machines, current protection.
Two honest limits on this. We searched the patent registers and could not locate the specific Alpha Spring patent number — everything above rests on Mul-T-Lock's own published claim plus the corroborating existence of MTL800, not on a register entry we have read. And key control here never rested on patent alone: the magnetic duplication card and the proprietary KC5 machine are a distribution control, contractual rather than legal, and entirely unaffected by any expiry. That part still works.
Three mechanisms sounds unbeatable and the engineering genuinely is impressive. The record is more nuanced, and a buyer spending $200–$330 deserves it.
Tab. 01
Documented MT5+ defeats
The thumbturn problem is the one to act on
Of everything above, this is the finding with a practical consequence. On a single-cylinder deadbolt — key outside, thumbturn inside — a bypass that reaches the thumbturn makes the cylinder irrelevant. It doesn't matter how many mechanisms are in it if the attack never goes near it.
This isn't unique to Mul-T-Lock. It's a category-wide issue and it's the same argument we make about letterboxes, pet doors and glazing near a thumbturn: any path to the inside handle defeats the entire lock. What's notable is that it applies to a flagship high-security product, and that no amount of cylinder engineering addresses it.
"Three mechanisms means it can't be picked."
It has been picked on video since 2016 and picked blind in 2019, and there is a public curriculum for learning how. What's true is that doing so requires serious dimple-picking skill, specific tooling and considerable practice, and that the population of people able to do it is small and not out burgling houses. That's a strong position. It just isn't the position the marketing describes.
VerdictOverstated. Excellent, teachable to defeat, and irrelevant against a thumbturn bypass.
Both are flagship high-security cylinders and they solve the problem in opposite ways. The MT5+ takes the pin tumbler and stacks conditions onto it until it becomes intractable. The Abloy Protec2 abandons pins entirely for rotating discs and a sidebar.
The previous version of this page called these "different roads, same destination." Having read both records properly, we'd revise that. The destinations aren't identical. The Abloy resisted the public locksport community longer, has fewer practitioners capable of opening it, and doesn't have a published curriculum.
Where the MT5+ answers back is the ecosystem. The magnetic card and dedicated cutting machine give a facilities manager a paper trail and a hard stop on duplication that works regardless of anyone's picking ability — and for most buyers of a lock at this price, unauthorised keys are a far more realistic threat than a specialist at the door.
Specification
Platform
MT5+, based on the MT5 cylinder platform
Mechanisms
Telescopic pin tumblers, locking bar with finger pins, Alpha Spring
Key
Double-sided — dimple cuts for the pins, milled side pattern for the locking bar
Certification
UL 437 listed; ANSI Grade 1; UL fire rated bolt on Hercular deadbolts. Also certified to the European standard EN 1303, the Dutch SKG scheme and the Israeli ISI 950 Manufacturer
Materials
Brass body and plug, steel tailpiece, nickel silver and stainless steel pins
Key control
Coded magnetic duplication card plus dedicated KC5 cutting machine at authorised dealers
Platform introduced
Around 2006, alongside the KC5 cutting machine
Alpha Spring patent
Stated by Mul-T-Lock as expiring 2025; we could not locate the register entry Manufacturer claim
Superseded by
MTL™800 — double alpha spring, backward compatible with MT5+ tooling Documented
First documented pick
2016 (mortise cylinder); picked blind 2019 Documented
Street price
Roughly $200–$330 depending on configuration
The MT5+ is what happens when a company refuses to abandon the pin tumbler and instead keeps adding conditions until the thing becomes genuinely hard. Telescopic pins, then a sidebar full of false gates, then a spring in the key that conjures a shear line into existence. It is inventive in a way very little hardware is.
It is also, precisely because it is a flagship, one of the most studied cylinders in the hobby — picked on video for a decade, picked blind, and taught. And on a thumbturn deadbolt, none of it engages, because the attack goes around rather than through.
That's not a reason to avoid it. It's a reason to buy it for what it's genuinely best at, which is knowing exactly who holds a key — and to spend the next four dollars on the frame.
Verdict — 8.5 / 10
Brilliant engineering, an honest defeat record, and outstanding key control that doesn't depend on a patent that has now run out.